Calcutta Koran Petition; THE JUDGEMENT

THE JUDGEMENT

(6)
THE JUDGEMENT
BIMAL CHANDRA BASAK
May 17 85.
Chandmal Chopra & Anr. Versus State of West Bengal
The Court: I have heard and disposed of this application on the 13th of May 1985 when I indicated that I shall give my reasons later.
Facts:
2. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the State of West Bengal to declare each copy of the Koran, whether in the original Arabic or in its translation in any of the languages, as forfeited to the Government.
3. This application was first moved before Khastgir J. The learned Judge entertained the application, gave directions for notice and for affidavits. Thereafter for some reason or other the learned Judge chose not to proceed in this matter any further and released this matter from her list. Such reason cannot be found out from the records of this case though the learned Judge had chosen to take an unprecedented step by giving an interview to the Press regarding the same of which I cannot and do not take any notice. The Chief Justice thereafter assigned this matter to me. As the learned Judge after giving directions has chosen not to hear this matter any further and as this matter has been assigned to me, I have recalled all the earlier orders and/or directions passed and heard the matter afresh as Court Application on the question of issue of the Rule nisi, if any. Accordingly the petitioner no. I who is appearing in person made submissions and prayed for issue of a Rule.
4. The learned Advocate General has appeared for the State and with the leave of this Court the learned Attorney General has made submissions on behalf of Union of India.
5. The petitioners have, in this petition, quoted some passages from the English translation of Koran and thereafter made the following averments:
The offending expressions contained in the Koran and quoted in paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 above are not so offensive in their translation in which they are so quoted as they are in the original verses in Arabic or in Urdu, the very sound of whose inimitable symphony not only sends the Muslims to tears and ecstasy but arouses in them the worst communal passions and religious fanaticism, which have manifested themselves in murder, slaughter, loot, arson, rape and destruction or desecration of holy places in historical times as also in contemporary period not only in India but almost all over the world. (paragraph 8).
In this way, the publication of the Koran in the original Arabic as well as in its translations in various languages including Urdu, Hindi, Bengali, English, etc., amounts to commission of offences punishable u/s 153A and 295A of the Indian Penal Code and accordingly each copy of the book must be declared as forfeited by the respondent u/s 95 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. (paragraph 9).
Submissions - Petitioner
6. The petitioner in his submission has repeated what has been stated in the petition. He has submitted that the provisions of Sections 153A and 295A of the Indian Penal Code are attached and accordingly the respondent should be directed to take action under Section 95 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He has submitted that Koran seeks to destroy idols. It encourages crime and invites violence. It is also against morality. It outrages the religious feelings of non-Muslims. It insults all religions excepting Islam. It encourages hatred, disharmony, feelings of enmity between different religious communities in India.
7. The relevant provisions of Section 95 of the Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as Cr. P.C.) and Sections 153A, 295 and 295A of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as I.P.C.), are set out hereinbelow:
Cr. P.C. - See. 95: ?(1) Where (a) any newspaper, or book (b) any document, wherever printed, appears to the State Government to contain any matter the publication of which is punishable under section 124A or section 153A or section 153B or section 292 or section 293 or section 295A of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), the State Government may, by notification, stating the grounds of its opinion, declare every copy of the issue of the newspaper containing such matter, and every copy of such book or other document to be forfeited to Government, and thereupon any police officer may seize the same wherever found in India and any Magistrate may by warrant authorise any police officer not below the rank of sub-inspector to enter upon and search for the same in any premises where any copy of such issue or any such book or other document may be or may be reasonably suspected to be.
(2) In this section and in section 96
(a) newspaper and book have the same meaning as in the Press and Registration of Book Act, 1867 (25 of 1867).
(b) document includes any painting, drawing or photograph or other visible representation.
(3) No order passed or action taken under this section shall be called in question in any court otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of section 96.?
I.P.C. - Sec. 153A: ?Whoever by words, either spoken or written or by visible representations, or otherwise, promotes or attempts to promote feelings of enmity or hatred between different classes of Her Majesty?s subjects, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to two years, or with fine or with both.?
I.P.C. - Section 295: ?Whoever destroys, damages or defiles any place of worship, or any object held sacred by any class of persons with the intention of thereby insulting the religion of any class of persons or with the knowledge that any class of persons is likely to consider such destruction, damage or defilement as an insult to their religion, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.?
Section 29SA: ?Whoever, with deliberate and malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of any class of His Majesty?s subjects, by words, either spoken or written, or by visible representations insults or attempts to insult the religion or the religious beliefs of that class, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.?
8. The petitioner no. 1 has addressed the Court in person and placed the petition and drawn my attention to the relevant provisions of the Act referred to above, and has submitted that it is a fit and proper case where such an order is to be passed against the Government directing them to take action under Section 95 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Submission - State
9. The learned Advocate General appearing on behalf of the State has placed before me Section 295 of the Indian Penal Code which I have set out above.
10. The learned Advocate General has submitted that the Koran is a sacred book of the Muslim community and making an order of the nature as prayed for would amount to abolition of this religion. Such a prayer offends the provisions of Section 295 of the I.P.C. and, therefore, the question of invoking jurisdiction of this Court in respect of Section 295A of the I.P.C. cannot and does not arise. In this connection he has relied on a decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Veerabadram Chettiar ? vs - V. Ramaswami Naicker & Ors. reported in A.I.R. 1958 S.C. 1032 at page 1035, paragraph 7. The relevant passage is set out hereinbelow:
?The learned Judge in the court below, has given much too restricted a meaning to the words ?any object held sacred by any class of persons,? by holding that only idols in temples or idols carried in processions on festival occasions, are meant to be included within those words. There are no such express words of limitation in S. 295 of the Indian Penal Code and in our opinion the learned Judge has clearly misdirected himself in importing those words of limitation. Idols are only illustrative of those words. A sacred book, like the Bible, or the Koran, or the Granth Saheb, is clearly within the ambit of those general words. If the courts below were right in their interpretation of the crucial words in S. 295 the burning or otherwise destroying or defiling such sacred books, will not come within the purview of the penal statute. In our opinion, placing such a restricted interpretation on the words of such general import, is against all established canons of construction. Any object however trivial or destitute of real value in itself, if regarded as sacred by any class of persons would come within the meaning of the penal section. Nor is it absolutely necessary that the object, in order to be held sacred should have been actually worshipped. An object may be held sacred by a class of persons without being worshipped by them. It is clear, therefore, that the courts below were rather cynical in so lightly brushing aside the religious susceptibilities of that class of persons to which the complainant claims to belong. The section has been intended to respect the religious susceptibilities of persons of different religious persuasions or creeds. Courts have got to be very circumspect in such matters, and to pay due regard to the feelings and religious emotions of different classes of persons with different beliefs, irrespective of the consideration whether or not they share those beliefs, or whether they are rational or otherwise, in the opinion of the court.?
Mr. Advocate General has submitted that the Koran has been in existence for a long time. No grievance has been made at any point of time by any one to the effect as the petitioner is seeking to do before this Court. He has submitted that this Court is not entitled to go into this matter as this relates to a question of religion itself. He has further submitted that this is a motivated application with the intention of destroying communal harmony.
He has relied on a decision in the case of Public Prosecutor - vs - P. Ramaswami reported in 1966 (1) C.L.J., 672.
Submission - Union of India.
12. Mr. Attorney General appearing on behalf of Union of India assisted by M.K. Banerjee Additional Solicitor General has adopted the submission of Mr. Advocate General and further added as follows:
He has referred to a passage from the Encyclopaedia Britannica at pages 444 and 445. He has submitted that the Koran is a basic text. It is the basis and foundation of the Muslim religion. This cannot be made justiciable in a court of law. The challenge of the petitioner amounts to not only an insult to the Muslim religion as such but against all other religions also. He has further submitted that certain passages taken out of context cannot be referred to for invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court. He has also relied on a passage from The Life and Letters of Raja Rammohan Roy written by Collet.
13. He has also relied on a decision in the case of Krishna Singh - vs - Mathura & Ors. reported in A.I.R. 1980 S.C. 707 at page 712 paragraph 17.
14. He has also relied on several passages from Fyzee and Mulla?s 18th Edition on Mohammedan Law.
15. He has also relied on a decision in the case of Ramjilal Modi - vs - State of U.P. reported in A.I.R. 1957 S.C. 620, paragraph 9.
16. Next. Mr. Attorney General has drawn my attention to the Preamble of the Constitution of India and Article 25 thereof which are set out hereinbelow:
Preamble : WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC and to secure to all its citizens Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship.
Art. 25: (1) Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion.
17. He has submitted that in view of such provisions of the Constitution the Court has no such power to give any such direction.
18. He has further relied on a passage from Halsbury?s Laws of England (4th Edition, Vol. 18, paragraphs 1692 and 1693).
19. He has further submitted that this is supposed to be a public interest litigation and this Court should be very cautious about the same. In this connection he has drawn my attention to the decision of the Supreme Court in Bandhu Mukti Morcha - vs - Union of India and others reported in 1984(3) S.C. 161 at 231 paragraphs 59 to 67.
Reply
20. The petitioner in his reply repeated his submissions.
Decision
21. Before examining the scope of the contention of the petitioners, it is necessary to ascertain the scope and importance of the Koran as such. It is the basic text of the Muslim religion. Like all other religions it proceeds on the basis that it is the only true religion and that those who do not follow that religion are not the true devotees of God.
22. As observed by the Supreme Court in the case of S. Veerabadram Chettiar - vs - V. Ramaswami Naicker (supra), as followed in the Madras decision of Public Prosecutor vs. Ramaswami (supra) the Koran, like the Bible and the Granth Saheb is a sacred book. It is an object held sacred by Muslims. Allah is considered as the God.
23. As pointed out in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, the Koran is the sacred scripture of the religion of Islam. It is a book in the Arabic language containing about 80,000 words. It is composed of 114 suras, or chapters, of varying size. The first sura, entitled ?The Opening?, is in the form of a short devotional prayer; it is constantly so used, ceremonially and otherwise, and by comparativists has been called ?the Lord?s Prayer of the Muslims?. It is addressed to God. The remainder of the Koran is in the form of an address from God, he either speaking himself, sometimes in the first person, or else, through the imperative ul, ?say? which introduces many verses and passages and some suras, ordering that the words that follow be proclaimed. The subject matter is varied; passages of one or several verses, or of an entire sura, deal in diverse ways with many topics. It speaks about oneness and omniscience and supreme majesty of God. The style at time fiery, is powerful, the general tone deeply moralist and theocentric; the whole reverberates with a passionate demand for obedience to the will of a transcendent but near and mightily active God.
24. In the faith of Muslims, and according to the theory propounded in the book itself, the Koran is the revealed word of God. This postulates God, and indeed the kind of God who has something to say to us and who takes the initiative in saying it. Religion in this view is not a human searching after God; it is God who acts, and is known because and insofar as, and only as, he chooses to disclose himself.
25. In the Muslim view, God created the universe, ordaining its processes and controlling them. He prescribed a pattern or order, which nature must obey. For man also he obtained a pattern of behaviour, but unlike the rest of the natural world, man was made conscious and free, to choose whether or not he will conform to God?s decrees. There is for mankind a right way to live; it is the Koran that seeks to make this known.
26. For Muslims the Koran is the ipsissima verba of God himself. It is God speaking to man not merely in 7th century Arabia to Mohammed but from all eternity to every man throughout the world including the individual Muslim as he reads it or devoutly holds it. It is eternal breaking through into time, the unknowable disclosed, the transcendent entering history and remaining here, available to mortals to handle and to appropriate, the divine become apparent. To memorise it, as many Muslims have ceremonially done, and perhaps even to quote from it, as every Muslim does daily in his formal prayers and otherwise, is to enter into some sort of communion with ultimate reality.
27. There is another aspect of this matter. There are various interpretations of different verses of the Koran. As pointed out by S.D. Collet in The Life and Letters of Raja Rammohan Roy two verses of the Koran quoted by Raja Rammohan Roy are interpreted differently by some modem scholars. So far as verse of the Koran under IX.5. is concerned according to a scholar, it does not refer to general massacre of all polytheists and idolaters, that is all non-Muslims, but it speaks only of those non-Muslims who were waging war at the time with the Muslims treacherously by breaking previous agreement.
28. According to the Mulla on Mohammedan Law there are four sources of Islamic Law, one of which is the ?Koran?. The word ?Islam? means peace and submission. In its religious sense it denotes submission to the will of God and in its secular sense the establishment of peace. The word ?Muslim? in Arabic is the active participle of ?As-salam? which is acceptance of the faith and of which the noun of action is ?Islam?. In English the word ?Muslim? is used both as a Noun and an Adjective and denotes both the persons professing faith and something peculiar to Muslims, such as law, culture, etc. The Muslims believe in the divine origin of their holy book which according to their belief was revealed to the prophet by the angel Gabriel. The ?Koran? is Al-furcan, i.e., one showing truth from falsehood and right from wrong. The Koran contains about 6000 verses but not more than 200 verses deal with legal principles. The portion which was revealed to the prophet at Mecca is, singularly free of legal matter and contains the philosophy of life and religion and particularly ?Islam?. As the Koran is of divine origin, so are the religion and its tenets and the philosophy and the legal principles which the Koran inculcates. The Koran has no earthly source. It was compiled from memory after the prophet?s death from the version of Osman the third Caliph.
29. It is in the light of the above that one should approach to examine the said book. Some passages containing interpretation of some chapters of the Koran quoted out of context cannot be allowed to dominate or influence the main aim and object of this book. It is dangerous for any court to pass its judgement on such a book by merely looking at certain passages out of context.
30. In my opinion the Koran being a sacred Book and ?an object held sacred by a class of persons? within meaning of Section 295 of Indian Penal Code, against such book no action can be taken under Section 295A. Section 295A is not attracted in such a case. Section 295A has no application in respect of a sacred book which is protected under Section 295 of I.P.C. Any other interpretation would lead to absurdity. If any offence, within the meaning of Section 295 is committed, in respect of Koran then it is punishable. Such Book gets protection in view of Section 295A. At the same time if it is open to take any such action under Section 295A against such Book, then the protection given under Section 295 will become nugatory and meaningless.
31. Further, as pointed out by the Supreme Court in the case of Ramji Lal Modi - vs - State of U. P. (supra) Section 295A does not penalise any and every act of insult or attempt to insult the religion or the religious beliefs of a class of citizens, which are not perpetrated with the deliberate and malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of that class. Insults to religion offered unwittingly or carelessly or without any deliberate or malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of that class do not come within the scope of the section. It only punishes the aggravated form of insult to religion when it is perpetrated with deliberate and malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of that class. I have set out the aim and object of the Koran. In my opinion it cannot be said that Koran offers any insult to any other religion. It does not reflect any deliberate or malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of non-Muslims. Isolated passages picked out from here and there and read out of context cannot change the position.
32. The Attorney General is right in his contention that such a construction as suggested cannot be given as this would amount to violation of the Constitution. I have already set out the Preamble to and Article 25 of the Constitution.
33. Preamble to the Constitution is a part of the Constitution. Keshavananda - vs - Kerala, A.I.R. 1973 S.C. 1461. Accordingly, it is open to the Court to keep the same in mind while considering any provision of the Constitution of India.
34. In my opinion passing of such order as prayed for would go against the Preamble of the Constitution and would violate the provisions of Article 25 thereof. The Preamble proclaims India to be a secular State. It means that each and every religion is to be treated equally. No preference is to be given to any particular religion. No religion is to be belittled. Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship are assured. Koran, which is the basic text book of Mohammedans, occupies a unique position to the believers of that faith as Bible is to the Christians and Gita, Ramayana and Mahabharata to the Hindus. In my opinion, if such an order is passed, it would take away the secularity of India and it would deprive a section of people of their right of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship. This would also amount to infringement of Article 25 which provides that all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and to propagate religion. Banning or forfeiture of Koran would infringe that right. Such action would amount to abolition of the Muslim religion itself. Muslim religion cannot exist without Koran. The proposed action would take away the freedom of conscience of the people of that faith and their right to profess, practise and propagate the said religion. Such action is unthinkable. The Court cannot sit in judgment on a holy book like Koran, Bible, Geeta and Granth Saheb.
35. As pointed out in Halsbury 4th Ed. Vol. 18 on ?Foreign Relations Law?, right of freedom of thought, conscience and religion includes freedom, alone or with or in community with others, and in public or private, to manifest religion or belief in worship, teaching, practice and observance. In my opinion, the action proposed will deprive a class of persons of their human rights.
36. There is another aspect of the matter. This sacred book has been in existence for a number of years with its different interpretations and translations. Upto now no one has chosen to challenge the same.
37. For similar reasons I also hold that Section 153A of the Indian Penal Code has no application in the facts of the present case. Apart from anything else, there is no question of forfeiture or banning of the said book on the grounds of disharmony or feelings of enmity or hatred or ill-will between different religions or communities. This book is not prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony between different religions. Because of the Koran no public tranquility has been disturbed upto now and there is no reason to apprehend any likehood of such disturbance in future. On the other hand the action of the petitioners may be said to have attempted to promote, on the grounds of religion, disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religions, i.e., between Muslims on the one hand and non-Muslims on the other within the meaning of Section 153A. Similarly, in my opinion, it may be said that by this petition the petitioners insult or attempt to insult the Muslim religion and the religious belief of the Muslims within the meaning of Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code. It is an affront to Islam?s Supreme Scriptural Authority. For this reason the contention of the respondents that this application is motivated cannot be completely ruled out.
38. The learned Attorney General was right in making comments regarding caution to be exercised in entertaining public interest litigation. A Writ petition is a very important proceeding. It is known as a High Prerogative Writ. Article 226 of the Constitution confers a wide power on the High Courts. It is wider than Article 32 itself. The High Court enjoys a jurisdiction which is not enjoyed by an ordinary civil court. In many cases where no remedy is available in an ordinary civil court, the Writ Court is the only forum. It is much more expeditious than an ordinary civil proceeding. However, in my opinion it is the duty of the Court while entertaining or admitting such application, particularly a public interest litigation, to be very cautious about the same, particularly where it is a matter of great public interest. In this context reference may be made to the judgment of Pathak J. in the case of Bandhu Mukti Morcha - vs - Union of India (supra). The present case involves the sentiment and religious feelings of a minority community. The matter involves religious feelings of millions of people not only in India but also outside India. It involves a highly delicate and sensitive issue. The application was entertained and admitted without going into the question of prima facie case and the jurisdiction and power of the Court to entertain this petition. In spite of the same directions were given for filing of affidavits. This by itself amounts to holding that there is a prima facie case though this question was not gone into. The Court should be circumspect in such kind of matters and be very cautious about the same. Otherwise though it might attract cheap publicity but may cause untold misery and disruption of religious harmony. The High Court should have been spared of the embarrassment caused. The petition should have been rejected forthwith and in limine as unworthy of its consideration as soon as it was moved.
39. For the aforesaid reasons I am of the opinion that the Writ Court?s jurisdiction has been wrongly sought to be invoked in this case. No prima facie case has been made out. It is clear that this Court has no power of jurisdiction to pass any such order as prayed for in this application.
40. For the aforesaid reasons this applications stands dismissed. No order as to costs.
41. In this connection I record my appreciation of the very frank, fair and sober manner in which this case has been argued by the Attorney General appearing for the Union of India and the Advocate General appearing for the State.
Sd/- (B.C. Basak)

aaStha, BJP aur parinati

आस्था, बीजेपी और परिणति
दैनिक जागरण ने अपने सम्पादकीय मे पाठकों को 'हे राम' शीर्षक द्वारा बताया है कि राम हिंदुओं की आस्था से जुड़ा है। यही बात बीजेपी के लोग, सांसद राजीव शुक्ल व अन्य लोग भी शियार की भाँती चिल्ला रहे हैं।

इन मूर्खों को यह भी नहीं मालूम कि यही आस्था, जिसके विरोध का किसी को संवैधानिक अधिकार नहीं, संविधान के अनुच्छेद २९(१) से संरक्षित, पोषित और प्रेरित है। यही आस्था मुसलमानों व ईसाइयों को ईश्वरीय आदेश व असीमित संवैधानिक अधिकार देती है कि मुसलमान हिंदुओं का इसलिये नरसंहार करें कि वे मूर्तिपूजक हैं (कुरान सूरह बकर २:१९१-१९३) और ईसाई इसलिये हिंदुओं का नरसंहार करें कि हिंदू ईसा को अपना राजा स्वीकार नहीं करते (बाइबिल, लूका १९:२७)। यदि नारी मुसलमान है तो उसका बलात्कार ईसाई करेगा (बाइबिल, याश्याह १३:१६) और ईसाई है तो मुसलमान (कुरान २३:६)। सर्वाधिक दुर्दशा हिंदू नारियों की है, जिनका बलात्कार ईसाई भी करेगा व मुसलमान भी. यह ईश्वरीय आदेश है. संविधान से पोषित है और सत्ता से जुड़ा प्रत्येक सांसद, जज व जनसेवक जातिहिंसा, लूट व नारी बलात्कार का समर्थन करने के लिए विवश है। बात यहीं समाप्त नहीं होती। न्यायपालिका ने कुरान व बाइबिल को धर्मपुस्तक, ईसाइयत व इस्लाम को धर्म और अजान को उपासना स्वीकार कर उसे आस्था से जोड़ दिया है, जिसके विरुद्ध कोई जज सुनवाई ही नहीं कर सकता. (ये आई आर, १९८५, कलकत्ता उच्च न्यायालय, १०४)। प्रत्येक सांसद व जज संविधान मे श्रद्धा व निष्ठा की शपथ लेता है (भारतीय संविधान, तीसरी अनुसूची) और प्रत्येक राज्यपाल व राष्ट्र पति संविधान के रक्षा की।

उल्लेखनीय है कि सत्ता के शिखर पर सुपर प्रधानमंत्री इंटोनिया माएनो बैठी है, जिसे हिंदुओं की जातिहिंसा यानी जेनोसाईड से कौन रोक लेगा?

एक ओर लोकतंत्र है और दूसरी ओर आर्यावर्त सरकार। हिंदू स्वयम निर्णय करें कि वे अपनी रक्षा चाहते हैं या सत्यानाश।

अप्रति

Religion V Dharm

Religion is not Dharm

How the Society & Kingdom conceived?

To protect from exploitation humanity invented their Sardars (Folk leaders) to protect the land, ladies, lives, liberties and labours of the folk. Folk gave a portion of their produce to the Sardars, who gave protection and justice to the folk. During this era man was owner of his land, produce and had freedom of worship. Kings are modified concept of Sardars. However, when kings came, they snatched lands from the citizens. The freedom of worship & property right was still there. How much tax kings would extort was decided by Manu, which is one sixth of the produce. To protect the citizens, kings deputed army, police and judges. Even today every government punishes the guilty.
Necessity is the mother of invention. To escape punishment and secure monopoly to subjugate one and all, rape any woman of their choice, plunder and murder those who refuse servilities and monopoly to rob and rape women, notorious prophets misappropriated religions and invented criminal gods Jehovah and Allah. In lieu of accepting servilities, the prophets exploited human weaknesses of booty and sex. While these prophets died they left behind, in legacy, their dogmas for their followers.
When Prophets came, they snatched lands, ladies, labours, liberties and lives of aliens. Nay! The prophets snatched freedom of worship from one and all.
There is scramble for sex, booty & slaves around the whole world. Moses was the first person who moralized Booty, rape of women (Bible Isaiah 13:15-16) and subjugation of aliens through his religion Judaism and his domestic servant Jehovah on the pretext of worshipping alien gods. (Bible Exodus/ Chapter 20 / The Ten Commandments/ Verses 3 & 5). Jesus improved the booty further. He moralized eating flesh of the son of man and drinking his blood (Bible John 6:53) and slaughter of one who does not accept him his ruler. (Bible, Luke, 19:27). Muhammad made Allah the owner of booty, (Koran 8:01) killer of non-Muslims, (Koran 8:17) rapist of women (Koran 4:24; 23:6; 33:50 & 70:30) and owner of the world. (Koran 2:255). Still these prophets provided limited right of properties to their followers i.e. Right to retain and enjoy booty. Property is power. Remaining in the hands of citizens, property prevents their subjugation and servitude. Therefore, Carl Marx invested property into the immoral, corrupt & usurper society.
Thus the basic cause, i.e. protection of lands, lives, ladies, liberties, and labours of the subjects, for whom the governments were invented and implemented, gets defeated. The snatching of one’s belongings, which is a crime, turns into the religious duty of every follower of these criminal religions and first part of the duties of democratic & socialist governments. The followers of these religions, socialists, and democrats find no immorality in snatching one’s property,one’s women and killing an innocent.
The notorious frauds named prophets have invented a new way of making the whole humanity their slaves irrespective of faith. These prophets have converted even their own followers, into their slaves for they have made their brain child gods unapproachable.
Now compare Ishwar with these Gods! In contrast, Ishwar alone grants freedom of faith and meets his followers direct without any broker. (Gita 7:21). Any one of any faith can meet Ishwar direct after performing Yoga or Kundalini Jagran. No one can meet Jehovah and Allah. While Jehovah has two brokers named Moses and Jesus, Allah has one alone named Mohammad. So why should one worship these impotent & criminal gods named Jehovah and Allah who make one slave, instigate one to murder, plunder and rape women of alien faiths and forbid one from worshipping a god of one’s choice, in lieu of Ishwar who gives one unfettered right to worship any god of one’s choice? Look! The notorious democracy calls this status of servility, freedom of faith! Therefore, the suggestion to these followers of criminal prophets is to relinquish their prophets and come into the fold of great and omnipresent Vedic culture. Do not believe in and do not accept religious servility for sex, booty & slave. Come to my fold I would provide you freedom to worship a God of your own choice, says Ishwar in Gita, See Chapter 7 Shloka 21.
Through the tailor compiled Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution by Jesus’ Congress, the criminal Muslims and Christians have been provided unfettered fundamental right to conserve their culture i.e. in fact right to liquidate or enslave every non-Muslim and non-Christian of the globe.
Nay! No one is innocent in the eyes of Islam and Christianity. If these religions survive, the survival of human race is impossible. These criminal religions have been detained in Bharat to eradicate Bharat and Vedic culture, but in the view of the black 11 September 2001, these sectarians would kill each other like Yadavas of Dwaper era. The reason is quite simple. There is perpetual war of supremacy between Allah and Jehovah. Both Christians and Muslims have to establish their culture and kingdom. War alone can decide the supremacy between them! Therefore, for the existence of human race the eradication of these criminal religions is must.

Join Aryavrt to eradicate these cultures from the globe.

So long as Indian Constitution, manifesto of Carl Marx, Koran, Bible, Democracy, Socialism, Islam and Christianity, survive in the globe, neither life nor property of a Muslim is safe nor of a Christian is safe. The honour and dignity of a woman is not safe.

To add insult to injury they call these criminal guides religious books and to tell contrary is crime amounting to blasphemy with sanction of death penalty! If Bible and Koran are religious books and to usurp alien lands, plunder aliens, rape aliens’ women are religion one wonders what crime is. So the time is ripe to wipe out criminal religions Christianity & Islam.

Muslims and Christians are fools. They are committing crime with the human race in lust of booty and sex. They are accepting servilities of the prevailing rulers. They are being cheated by their rulers in lieu of booty and sex.

To earn bread farmers tame poultry and sheep that need investment for their maintenance. The criminal usurper Socialists have invented the cruelest dogmas to make man source of exploitation without investment of single paisa. Man has become worse animal of exploitation than these sheep, bullocks and cows.

In notorious usurper democracy, man has reduced to the most hapless source of exploitation in lust of its own greed for share in booty. Man has lost his acumen. He is unable to understand the game of social engineering and is on the verge of annihilation. Buying man as slave has become obsolete with the help of the dogmas of these criminal gods.

Man is slave of his commodities. So now, Governments of the globe have monopolized commodities. From milk after birth up to fuel for pyre after death is now under the grip of these criminal democrats, socialists, communists, Muslims and Christians. Although Union of India claims to be the biggest democracy of the world, Union of India has snatched the foundation of democracy viz the right to choose. The Union of India has snatched the fundamental rights of freedom of faith through Article 29(1) and right to property through 39(c) and omission of Article 31 of the Indian Constitution. Even a voter cannot change these draconian laws.

The reasons for granting incentives

Moses was the first person who gave moral status to Booty, rape of women (Bible, Isaiah 13:15-16) & subjugation of aliens through his religion Judaism & his domestic servant Jehovah on the pretext of worshipping alien gods. (Bible Exodus 20:3 & 5). Jesus improved the booty further. He gave moral status to eating flesh of the son of man and drinking his blood (Bible John 6:53) and slaughter of one who does not accept him his ruler. (Bible, Luke, 19:27). Muhammad made Allah the owner of booty, (Koran 8:01) & owner of the world, (Koran 2:255), killer of non-Muslims, (Koran 8:17), who condones the rapists of women (Koran 4:24; 23:6; 33:50 & 70:30) and incest (Koran 33:36-37).

Muhammad invented Allah who is the owner & distributor of booty, (Koran 8:1 & 41), killer of non-Muslims, (Koran 8:17) instigates the rape of women (Koran 23:6) & is the owner of the world. (Koran 2:255). Still Jesus & Muhammad provided limited right of booty to their followers. Property is power. Remaining in the hands of citizens, property prevents their subjugation, servitude, & eradication. Carl Marx invested property into the immoral, corrupt & usurper society.

Aryavrt wishes to provide one long cherished property right as mentioned in Manusmriti 8:308 as well as freedom of faith as mentioned in Gita 7:21. Now it is up to human race as to whether she wants servility and eradication or freedom and immortality!

To add insult to injury they call these criminal guides religious books and to tell contrary is crime amounting to blasphemy with sanction of death penalty! If Bible and Koran are religious books and to usurp alien lands, plunder aliens, rape aliens’ women are religion one wonders what crime is. So the time is ripe to wipe out criminal religions Christianity & Islam.

Muslims and Christians are fools. They are committing crime with the human race in lust of booty and sex. They are accepting servilities of the prevailing rulers. They are being cheated by their rulers in lieu of booty and sex.

Muslims claim that Allah had given a book named Koran to the so called prophet Muhammad. Let us examine all the commandments of Allah in context with the very Koran, separately,
Allah alone can be worshipped.

Peruse the Koran Surah 4, the women, verse 56 which exhorts, “Lo! Those who disbelieve our revelations, We shall expose them to fire. As often as their skins are consumed, we shall exchange them for fresh skins, so that they may taste the torment. Lo! Allah is ever mighty. Wise.

Muslims recite a sermon, “La Ila h Illallaahu Muhammadur Rasul ullah.” The English translation of this Arabic sermon is, “Allah alone can be worshipped. Muhammad is his messenger.”

There is clear-cut verse in Koran,
“98. Verily ye, (Unbelievers), and the (false) gods that Ye worship besides Allah, Are (but) fuel of Hell! To it will ye (surely) come! Koran Surat .21 Al-Anbiyaa. (The Prophets) Extracted from the Koran of King Fahd, the custodian of two mosques Mecca and Madinah.

NOTE: These verses are the burning examples of confrontation between Islam and other faiths. Public servants including judiciary has been deputed to compel citizens believe that Islam supports religious tolerance and peaceful co-existence with other faiths. Every agent of democracy named public servant has been deputed to protect and support these verses. Can the President Kalam belie these verses?

AIlah is a war monger.

“216. Warfare is ordained for you, though it is hateful unto you; but it may happen that ye hate a thing which is good for you, and it may happen that ye love a thing which is bad for you. Allah knoweth, ye know not'KORAN' Chapter 2 (The Cow) Verse 216.
“O Prophet! Exhort the believers (Muslims) to fight. If there be of you twenty steadfast they shall overcome two hundred, and if there be of you a hundred steadfast they shall overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they (the non-Muslims) are a folk without intelligence'KORAN' Chapter 8 (The Spoils of War) Verse 65.

“255. Allah! There is no God save him, ... Unto him belongeth whatsoever is in Heavens and ... in the earth...” Koran Chapter 2 (The Cow) Verse 255.Criminal Allah would be pleased and reward them with Firdaus i.e. the highest brothel that consist of not only houris but also adolescent boys, where Allah would serve Muslims with his own hand best wine (Koran Chapter 76).

Allah hates other Gods and is owner of earth and heavens.

Thus Allah snatches the citizens’ right of property.

Stealing

38. As for the thief, both male and female, cut off their hands. It is the reward of their own deeds, an exemplary punishment from Allah. Allah is Mighty and Wise. The Table Spread. (5) verse 38.

Allah permits incest

[33.37] And when you said to he whom Allah had favored and yourself have favored: 'Keep your wife and fear Allah, ' and you sought to hide in yourself what Allah was to reveal, fearing people; although Allah has a better right for you to fear Him. And when Zayd had accomplished what he would of her (divorce), We gave her to you (Prophet Muhammad) in marriage, so that there is no fault in believers concerning (marriage to) the former spouse of their foster children if they divorced them. The decree of Allah must be done.

Allah is criminal robber.

“1. They ask thee (O Muhammad) of the spoils (booty) of war. Say: The spoils of war belong to Allah and the messenger, so keep your duty to Allah, and adjust the matter of your difference, and obey Allah and His messenger, if ye are (true ) believers.” ‘KORAN’. Chapter 8 (The Spoils of War) Verse 1.

Thus Allah snatches non Muslims belongings. The excuse is crystal clear. Non Muslims do not believe in this criminal Allah.

Allah abrogates peace.

Non Muslims do not believe in this criminal Allah.
“12. When thy Lord inspired the angels, (saying) I am with you. So make those who believe stand firm. I will throw fear into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Then smite the necks and smite of them each fingers'KORAN' Chapter 8 (The Spoils of War) Verse 12.

Allah and people of book

“29. Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden, which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the Religion of Truth, from among The People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” Surat At Tauba (9) Verse 29. Extracted from the Koran of King Fahd, the custodian of two mosques Mecca and Madinah.

Allah is criminal murderer.

“17. Ye (Muslims) slew them (non Muslims) not, but Allah slew them. And thou (Muhammad) threwest not when thou didst throw, but Allah threw, that He might test the believers by a fair test from Him. ...” KORAN Chapter 8 (The Spoils of War) Verse 17. Extracted from the Koran of King Fahd, the custodian of two mosques Mecca and Madinah.

Allah is communal enemy of humanity commands his followers to eradicate non Muslims.

“39. And fight them (non-Muslims) until persecution is no more, and religion is all for Allah. But if they cease (accept Islam) then lo! Allah is Seer of what they do'KORAN' Chapter 8 (The Spoils of War) Verse 39. See Chapter 2 (The Cow) verse 193 also.

“9. O Prophet! Strive hard Against the Unbelievers And the Hypocrites, And be harsh with them. Their abode is Hell. An evil refuge (indeed).” Koran, Chapter 66 Verse 9. Surat At-Tuhrim, 66. Extracted from the Koran of King Fahd, the custodian of two mosques Mecca and Medinah.

Allah distributes booty among his followers.

“And know that whatever ye take as spoils of war, lo! a fifth thereof is for Allah, and for the messenger and for the kinsman (who hath need) and orphans and the needy and the wayfarer, if ye believe in Allah and that which We revealed unto Our slave on the Day of Discrimination, the day when the armies met. And Allah is Able to do all things.” ‘KORAN’. Chapter 8 (The Spoils of War) Verse 41.

Allah commands bloodshed before caption

“67. It is not for any Prophet to have captives until he hath made slaughter in the land. Ye desire the lure of this world and Allah desireth (for you) the Hereafter, and Allah is Mighty, Wise.” ‘KORAN’. Chapter 8 (The Spoils of War) Verse 67.

NOTE: Islam honours those Muslims alone who fights to eradicate other faiths save Islam. Those who simply believe and do not fight in eradication of other faiths are sufferers. They are suffering in hell of grave till the Day of Judgment. In contrast those who fight either get instant heaven as martyr or become Ghazi and owner of victim’s women and properties after sharing the one fifth part of booty to criminal Allah. Public servants have been deputed to liquidate one who discloses these facts.

Allah made booty lawful

“69. Now enjoy what ye have won, as lawful and good, and keep your duty to Allah ...”.’KORAN’. Chapter 8 (The Spoils of War) Verse 69.

Allah commands plunder of non Muslim females. Permits their rape.

"24. Also (prohibited are) Women already married, Except those Whom your right hands possess..." Extracted from the Koran of King Fahd, the custodian of two mosques Mecca and Madinah. See Koran Surat An-Nisaa (4) verse 24.
Koran 23:06-05-07
“5. Who guards their modesty.”
The very Koran of Fahd reports in the footnote,
"The Muslim must guard himself against every kind of sex abuse or sex perversion. The new psychology associated with the name of Freud traces many of our hidden motives to sex, and it is common knowledge that our refinement or degradation may be measured by the hidden workings of our sex instincts. But even the natural and lawful exercise of sex is restricted to the marriage bond, under which the rights of both parties are duly regulated and maintained."."."."."." Extracted from the Koran of King Fahd, the custodian of two mosques Mecca and Madinah. See Koran Surat 70 verses 29 & 30 also.
“6. Except with those joined to them in the marriage bond or (the captives) whom their right hand possess, for (in their case) they are free from blame.”
“7. But those whose desires exceed Those limits are transgressors:-
“50. O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, ... and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war...” ‘KORAN’ Chapter 33 (The clans/Al-Ahzab) Verse 50.
“Koran 2:223. Your women are a tilth for you ...”. The sons are legitimate owners of the tilth of fathers. Still those, who came heavily upon Sati glorification, or any Muslim neither intercourses with his mother nor condemns Koran. Similarly Koran exhorts Muslims for war 2:216, legitimates booty (Koran 8:1 & 41) and the rape of women of others (Koran 4:24; 23:6; 33:50 & 70:30). Nay! Koran teaches treachery with motherland 2:255

Allah shower blessings on the prophet

Allah is humble servant and prays peace for Muhammad.

The stunning Islamic inconsistency that proves dominance-urge of Muhammad. It goads Muhammad achieve highest power and prestige.

“56. Allah and His angels, send blessings on the prophet: O ye that believe! Send ye blessings on him, and salute him with all respect‘KORAN’. Chapter 33 (The clans/Al-Ahzab) Verse 56. Extracted from the Koran of King Fahd, the custodian of two mosques Mecca and Madinah. The clans/confederates/ Al-Ahzab 33:56.

This is ploy to secure dominance

Allah commands forcible conversion and slaughter.

“5. Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolators (non Muslims who worship idols) wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due (like Ravan on the point of the brutal sword of Islam accept Islam), then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is forgiving, Merciful.” Koran Chapter IX-Repentance Part 10 para 5.

When Allah himself is criminal how can his prophet and his followers not be criminals. Why should one be made to believe in criminal God, who is more criminal and dangerous than heinous criminals?

Why should one not believe in Vedic culture and polity as hereunder,

a. Vedic philosophy states,

The wives of others are mothers, the wealth of others are clays, the same soul resides in every creature, while the believers of Allah are compelled to believe that they are masters of non-Muslim ladies, distributors of non-Muslim ladies amongst Muslims, rightful owner of booty and killer of non-Muslims, which are contrary to Vedic philosophy and ideology of Sanatan Dharma.

Allah promises booty

“20. Allah promiseth you much booty that ye will capture, and hath given you this in advance, and hath withheld men’s hands from you, that it may be a token for the believers, and that He may guide you on a right path”.’KORAN’ Chapter 48 (Victory/ Al-Fath) Verse 20.

Fraternity in the way of Allah, his Koran and Muslims,

“If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbours in it but a little while.” Koran Chapter 33 Verse 60

“Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter.” Koran Chapter 33 Verse 61.

“ O ye who believe! Choose not your fathers nor your brethren for friends if they take pleasure in disbelief rather than faith. Whoso of you taketh them for friends, such are wrongdoers.” Koran Chapter 9 Repentance Verse 23

“28. O ye who believe! The idolators only are unclean. So let them not come near the Inviolable place of worship ...” Koran Chapter 9 Repentance Verse 28

“They but wish that ye should reject faith. As they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): So take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (from what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; And (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks.” Koran Chapter 4 Verse 89 Surat An-Nisa.

Neighbour

“O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you ... and let them find harshness in you ...” ..... Koran Chapter 9 Repentence Verse 123.

Now Jesus

So for I gave you the brief account of Islam of Muslims and its notorious criminal Allah and his Koran. Now I will deal with Jehovah, his alone son Jesus and his sheep named Christians.

Says Bible,

Extracted from Bible-Luke/ Chapter 19 / Verse 27.

“But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them bring them here and kill them in front of me.”

Extracted from Bible John/ Chapter 6 / Verse 53

Jesus said to them, “I am telling you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood; you have no life in you.”

Extracted from Bible Deuteronomy/ Chapter 12 / Verses 1-2-3 (Bible Deut. 12:1-2-3)

The one Place of Worship

1. “These are the decrees and laws you must be careful to follow in the Land that the Lord, the God of your fathers, has given you to possess as long as you live in the land. (Bible, Deut. 12:1)
2. “Destroy completely all the places on the high mountains and on the hills and under every spreading tree where the nations you are dispossessing worship their gods. (Bible, Deut. 12:2)
3. “Break down their altars, smash their sacred stones and burn their Asherah poles in the fire; cut down their idols of their Gods and wipe out their names from those places. (Bible, Deut. 12:3)

Extracted from Bible Deuteronomy/ Chapter 20 / Verses 13 & 14

13. “When the LORD your God delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the men in it." (Bible Deut. 20:13)
14. “As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves. And you may use the plunder the LORD your God gives you from your enemies." (Bible Deut. 20:14)

Extracted from Bible, Old Testament, Isaiah/ Chapter 13 / Verses 15-16.
15. "Whoever is captured will be thrust through; all who is caught will fall by the sword." (Bible, Isaiah 13:15)
16. "Their infants will be dashed to pieces before their own eyes; their houses will be looted and their wives ravished." (Bible, Isaiah 13:16)

Special Note: Check the meaning of ravish in the dictionary.

CAN YOU REBUT ANTONIA MAINO MAINO ALIAS GANDHI THE IMPOSTER?

The above verses of Koran and Bible are the true faces of the secularism and freedom of the right to conserve the above cultures practiced by Union of India? Gods named Allah and Jehovah are obedient servants of these very Muhammad & Jesus Christ. Jesus, the living Son of God, could not protect himself from crucifixion. So how great is his domestic servant God? Similarly Allah is the domestic servant of Muhammad and sends blessings to Muhammad for the crimes committed against human race.

That is what the Christians and Muslims did so far. The rights to enslave and conquer alien lands, slay the native inhabitants, rape their women, burn, and desecrate aliens’ worship places have constitutional support! I feel pity for the human race. Would the humanity survive?

Then why Islam is sacred cow?

Simply because Allah is votary of booty and killer of non Muslims of the globe. The system is robber. A robber steers clear of any hindrance in the robbery. Vedic culture opposes robbery of the subjects. So to eradicate Vedic culture and liquidate their followers, they are engaged in plundering the subjects with the aid of the dogmas of the so called Allah of Muhammad, Jehovah of Moses and socialism of Carl Marx who are owners of the properties of the subjects. Nay! Allah is supreme, because he is owner of booty. So the subjects of the world are economic slaves, not free as one is made to believe by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, Union of India and his disciples.

That Vedic politics opposes the snatching of the property of subjects. Therefore believers of Vedic politics are notorious communal people.

That Islam has sermon ‘Ilah Ill Allah’ which means Allah alone can be worshipped. How is it secular religion and prayer?

Vedic culture’s tenet is,

‘Yo Yo Yam Yam tanu bhaktah shrdhyarchitumichchhasi.

Tasya tasyaachlam shraddham tameh vidhmamyaham.’ Gita 7.21,

Meaning. Whatever celestial form a devotee (craving for some worldly object) chooses to worship with reverence, I stabilize the faith of that particular devotee in that very form.

Koran, the commands of Allah, the brain child of Muhammad commands,
There is clear-cut verse in Koran, “98. Verily ye, (Unbelievers), And the (false) gods that Ye worship besides Allah, Are (but) fuel of Hell! To it will ye (surely) come! Koran Surat, Al-Anbiyaa. (The Prophets) Extracted from the Koran of King Fahd, the custodian of two mosques Mecca and Madinah.
“22. And who doth greater wrong than he who is reminded of the revelations of his Lord, then turneth from them. Lo! We shall requite the guilty.” Koran Chapter 32 (The Prostration/As-Sajdah) Verse 22.

Now non Muslims of the world have to decide who are seculars? Those who believe in unity of God or those who believe in Gita?

Islam is the best religion because booty belongs to Allah and His messenger.
Allah is Ishwar of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi because he is killer of non Muslims.

That Governments have been invented and established for the protection of the lives, dignities and properties of the subjects. Now the Governments around the world are engaged in plundering the subjects with the aid of the dogmas of the so called Allah of Muhammad, Jehovah of MosesMoses and socialism of Carl Marx who are owners of the properties of the subjects. Nay! Allah is supreme, because he is owner of booty. So the subjects of the world are economic slaves, not free as one is made to believe by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, Union of India and his disciples.

Vedic politics opposes the snatching of the property of subjects. Therefore believers of Vedic politics are notorious communal people.
Then why is democracy and her elements are concealing the truth?
There is no democracy. The right to choose is the first stipulation of the democracy, which is being denied since the transfer of power by the Jesus to their Congress Party. There is no freedom of faith, expression,

The revered martyr Pandit Nathuram Godse had long back disclosed the facts in his written answer to the charge sheet in paras, quoted as hereunder,

“119... For had the Indian press impartially criticized the anti national policy carried on by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and had they impressed upon the people that the interest of the nation was far greater than the whim of any individual, howsoever great he may be, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and his followers could never have dared concede Pakistan to the Muslims as easily as has been done. The press had displayed such weakness and submission to the High Command of the Congress that it allowed the mistakes of leaders pass away freely and unnoticed and made vivisection easy by their policy...”
“120. It is stated in some quarters that the people could not have got the independence unless Pakistan was conceded. But I took it to be an utterly incorrect and untrue view. To me it appears to be merely a poor excuse to justify the action taken by the leaders. The leaders of the Gandhian creed often claim to have conquered Swarajya by their struggle. If they had conquered Swarajya, then it would be clearly seen that it is most ridiculous to say that those Britishers who yielded, were in a position to lay down the condition of Pakistan before the grant of independence could be only one reason for Gandhi and his followers to give their consent to the creation of Pakistan and it is that these people were accustomed to make a show of hesitation and resistance in the beginning and ultimately to surrender to the Muslim demands.".”
"“121. Pakistan was conceded on the 15th of August 1947, and how? Pakistan was conceded by deceiving the people and without any consideration for the feelings and opinions of the people of Punjab, Bengal, NWF province, Sind, etc. Indivisible Bharat was divided into two and in one of its parts a theocratic State was established. The Muslims obtained the fruit of their anti-national movements and actions in the shape of Pakistan. The leaders of the Gandhian creed ridiculed the opponents of Pakistan as traitors and communal minded, while they themselves helped in the establishment of a Muslim State in India yielding to the demands of Mr. Jinnah. This event of Pakistan had upset the tranquillity of my mind. But even after the establishment of Pakistan if this Gandhian Government had taken any steps to protect the interests of Hindus in Pakistan it could have been possible for me to control my mind which was terribly shaken on account of this terrible deception of the people. But, after handing over crores of Hindus to the mercy of Muslims of Pakistan Gandhi and his followers have been advising them not to leave Pakistan but continue to stay on. The Hindus thus were caught in the hands of Muslim authorities quite unawares and in such circumstances series of calamities followed one after the other. When I bring to my mind all these happenings my body simply feels a horror of burning fire, even now.
122. Every day that dawned brought forth the news about thousands of Hindus being massacred, Sikhs numbering 15000 having been shot dead, hundreds of women torn of their clothes being made naked and taken into procession and that Hindu women were being sold in the market places like cattle. Thousands and thousands of Hindus had to run away for their lives and they had lost everything of theirs. A long line of refugees extending over the length of 40 miles was moving towards the Indian Union. How was this terrible happening counteracted by the Union Government? Oh! By throwing bread to the refugees from the air!
123. These atrocities and the bloodbath would have to some extent been checked if the Indian Government had lodged strong protests against the treatment meted out to the Minorities in Pakistan or even if a cold threat had been held out to the Muslims in India of being treated in the same manner as a measure of retaliation. But the Government which was under the thumb of Gandhi resorted to absolutely different ways. If the grievances of the minorities in Pakistan were voiced in the Press, it was dubbed as an attempt to spread disaffection amongst the communities and made an offence and the Congress Governments in several Provinces started demanding securities under the Press Emergency Powers Act, one after the other, I was alone served with notices demanding securities to the extent of Rs. 16, 000 and in the Bombay Province alone nearly 900 such cases have occurred, an is stated by the Home Minister, Mr. Morarjibhai Desai in the Court. Nothing was done to redress the grievances of the Press even though Press deputations waited upon the Ministers. Thus there was total disappointment in my attempt to bring pressure by peaceful means upon the Congress Governments guided by Gandhian creed.”

Thus what I find is that the plunder of the subjects started no sooner Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi came from Africa in year 1915 (exactly Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi left South Africa on 18.7.1914 for India) and yet there is no respite.

The very dogma that property belongs to society is the economic servility of the subjects and not independence as the subjects are made to believe.

That whatever is crime in Vedic culture, nay! even the laws of the land of any nation, becomes lawful in democracy, communism and Islam for the sake of booty.

Apt

===

काफ़िर

इसलाम ने मानव जाति को दो हिस्सों मे बाँट रक्खा है । मात्र अल्लाह की पूजा करने वाले मोमिन हैं। अल्लाह के अतिरिक्त अन्य देवता की पूजा करने वाले काफ़िर हैं। इसी प्रकार वह धरती जिस पर अल्लाह का शासन नही है दार उल हरब है। काफ़िर व दार उल हरब को समाप्त करना जिहाद है। यह मुसलमान की संस्कृति है। इसी प्रकार जो ईसा को राजा स्वीकार न करे उसे क़त्ल करने की बाइबिल, लूका १९:२७ मे स्वयम् ईसा की आज्ञा है। भारतीय संविधान का अनुच्छेद २९(१) हर मुसलमान व हर ईसाई को अपनी जिहाद व मिशन संस्कृति को बनाए रखने का असीमित मौलिक अधिकार देता है। जज व सांसद संविधान मे आस्था व निष्ठा की शपथ लेते हैं और प्रेसिडेंट व राज्यपाल संविधान रक्षा की. आप विचार करें कि कौन जीवित बचेगा?
अप्रति